Qase is a modern, API-first test management platform with a clean UI and a strong REST API, a favorite of engineering-led teams. Trulit is also modern and AI-native, but the pricing models differ: both meter AI with credits, but Trulit includes AI and automation credits in every paid plan with no separate add-ons, whereas Qase’s AI runs on credits with overages and puts SSO behind a paid add-on. Honest framing: this is not “credits vs no credits,” it is “included, no add-ons” vs “credits plus add-ons.”
At a glance (as of 2026)
| Feature | Trulit | Qase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | AI-native platform + codeless automation | Modern, API-first test management |
| Free tier | 3 users, 2 projects | 3 users, 2 projects, 500MB |
| Startup | $5/user/mo ($4 annual) | $24/user/mo ($20 annual) |
| Business | $10/user/mo ($8 annual) | $36/user/mo ($30 annual) |
| AI model | Credits included in every paid plan, no separate add-on | AIDEN AI on credits; overages apply |
| SSO | Included (Enterprise) | Paid add-on (~$4/user/mo on Business) |
| Codeless automation built in | Yes | Automation via API/reporters |
| MCP (Cursor, Claude) | Yes | Not publicly documented |
Who wins where
Lower price at every tier ($5/$10 vs $24/$36, as of 2026). AI and automation credits included in the plan with no separate AI SKU, and SSO included at Enterprise rather than a paid add-on (Qase charges extra for SSO on Business). Codeless automation built into the platform. MCP integration for AI coding agents. The “one platform, one price, no add-ons” model vs Qase’s credits-plus-add-ons structure.
A polished, well-regarded modern UI, a genuinely strong API-first design with excellent automation reporters (Playwright, pytest, JUnit), a generous free tier, fast onboarding and a track record since 2019 with 2,000+ customers. For engineering-led teams that live in code and value API depth, Qase is an excellent, proven choice.